Home Library Translate
A A A
Share »
Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on LinkedIn
Connect »

Blog: Boards of Directors

Menu

  • This Blog's Home
  • Guest Writer Submissions
  • Policies
  • To Subscribe to a Blog
  • About
  • Feedback

Board Remuneration – Creative Solutions

By Julie Garland McLellan on September 27, 2011

One of the longest running and most passionately argued debates on LinkedIn concerns the issue of payment for directors of not-for-profit organisation boards. Although the focus of the mainstream press has remained fixed on the high salaries of executive directors and the apparent abuses of performance hurdles so that executives are rewarded for destroying, rather than creating value, the issue of how to remunerate non-executive directors (NEDs) is one that many smaller companies grapple with.

At the ‘top end of town’ the large listed companies pay NEDs a set directors fee, often with a component that is paid into a superannuation fund, which does not vary with corporate performance or other hurdles. The governance codes recognise that performance related pay, with its issues of timing and disclosure, is not appropriate to remunerate the custodians of long term value creation. Many board advisers would advocate provisions to ensure that stock options and performance related remuneration were reserved for the executives and never used for NED remuneration.
However, I prefer to see boards (and, if you can get them into a decision-making forum, shareholders) consider the principle and then adopt the practice that best suits them given the strategy and circumstances of the company. Start-ups and turnarounds often have very limited cash available, and few avenues for raising equity and debt. Those companies need to think very carefully about how they remunerate their NEDs.

There is great value in independence and this is sacrificed if the NEDs have stock and/or options as a significant component of their remuneration. However, if there is not enough cash to attract competent NEDs then the choice of sacrificing independence to gain competence becomes a valid choice. It should not be made lightly or without putting in place some very clear risk management to avoid or reduce the conflicts of interest that will arise.

Companies have gone to IPO with weak boards because they simply would not pay for proper NEDs. These companies rarely prosper. A swift takeover at an almost advantageous price is the best outcome that their unfortunate shareholders can expect. The more normal outcome is a slow process of under-performance and missed opportunities followed by an accelerating process of deterioration as unmanaged risks and poor decisions decrease the value of the company and its stock until it is quietly delisted or suffers an acrimonious takeover in which the shareholders lose almost all the value of their investment. It can be galling to see the NEDs walk away from the disaster claiming they did the best that could be done under the circumstances (which they allowed to eventuate).

There are several good NEDs in the high technology and mining sectors who receive some compensation in the form of stock options. These are often options that vest slowly and result in shares with escrow provisions. In these cases shareholders are generally sophisticated and aware of the risks of the sector and the likely (or unlikely) prospects of success. The shareholders make a rational decision to accept the use of stock to conserve cash and know that this increases some risks whilst managing another. The value and quantum of stock and the hurdles for triggering release are fiercely debated at AGMs and EGMs until a solution is achieved that meets the needs of all concerned. Constitutions, charters and governance practices and structures are specifically designed to manage the conflicts of interest that will inevitably arise.

Remuneration is a complex and nuanced aspect of company strategy and most good boards will have some very serious discussions about it. Good expert advice is needed if you are going to adopt a practice that deviates from general governance recommendations. Excellent disclosure and informed shareholders are required to properly authorize the use of stock as a component of NED remuneration.

Many of the disasters where NEDS have acted from conflicts positions because of the impact to their options or stock holdings have come from companies that did not consider and manage the governance risks and that disclosed it to their shareholders in a minimalist fashion. We should be wary lest many others repeat these disasters. Boards need a governance regime that permits companies use any form of compensation that meets their strategic needs.

Shareholders need a generally accepted good practice; a simple directors fee paid annually in instalments like a salary is probably the simplest solution and creates the least number of risks to be managed. Disclosure and informed markets should support appropriate investment decisions and funds should flow preferentially towards companies with good strategic remuneration policies, at board and executive levels.

What do you think?
______________________________________
Julie Garland-McLellan has been internationally acclaimed as a leading expert on board governance. See her website and LinkedIn profiles, and get her books Dilemmas, Dilemmas: Practical Case Studies for Company Directors and Presenting to Boards.

« Previous Next »

Search Our Site

Meet this Blog’s Co-Hosts

Carter McNamara of Authenticity Consulting, LLC, provides organization development and consultant training services, and is developer of the Free Management Library. [Read more ...]


Julie Garland-McLellan uses her experience and depth of knowledge in corporate governance to show boards with limited resources how to be more effective through practical governance innovation and know-how.
[Read more ...]


Nick Lindsay of Elemental CoSec, provides corporate governance, legal and company secretarial advice to a wide range of companies in the UK.
[Read more ...]

Recent Blog Posts

  • Will beneficial ownership registers spread around the World?
  • Governing an entrepreneur – a dilemma
  • Can a director serve two interests? – a dilemma
  • When a director knows what isn’t in the papers – a dilemma
  • Should the MD have a vote? – a dilemma
  • Association boards and conflicts of interest – a dilemma
  • Issues for a prospective owner director – a dilemma
  • 51% compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code
  • 10 Myths About Boards of Directors
  • How to manage excessive demands on time (from a powerful person)? – a dilemma

Categories of Posts

  • Accountabilities, Laws and Ethics
  • Basics and Overviews
  • Basics and Overviews
  • Board Committees
  • Board Evaluations
  • Board Meetings
  • Board Membership
  • Board Training and Dev.
  • General Resources
  • Recurring Activities
  • Roles and Responsibilities
  • Supervising CEO
  • Uncategorized

Related Library Topics

  • Board / Employees Roles
  • Board Basics
  • Board Development
  • Board Models
  • Board Operations
  • Board Policies
  • Board Staffing
  • Board Training
  • Committees
  • Compensation of Members
  • Evaluating the Board
  • Laws and Ethics
  • Meetings
  • Roles and Responsibilities

Library's Blogs

  • Boards of Directors
  • Building a Business
  • Business Communications
  • Business Ethics, Culture and Performance
  • Business Planning
  • Career Management
  • Coaching and Action Learning
  • Consulting and Organizational Development
  • Crisis Management
  • Customer Service
  • Facilitation
  • Free Management Library Blogs
  • Fundraising for Nonprofits
  • Human Resources
  • Leadership
  • Marketing and Social Media
  • Nonprofit Capacity Building
  • Project Management
  • Quality Management
  • Social Enterprise
  • Spirituality
  • Strategic Planning
  • Supervision
  • Team Building and Performance
  • Training and Development
About Feedback Legal Privacy Policy Contact Us
Free Management Library, © Copyright Authenticity Consulting, LLC ®; All rights reserved.
  • Graphics by Wylde Hare LLC
  • Website maintained by Caitlin Cahill

By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.X