Steve Ober is now co-hosting the leadership blog and that means that readers will be getting a deep and interesting dive into systemic leadership. In the coming months I will continue to provide an overview of some of the more prominent leadership theories, approaches, and practices. I just concluded a four week introduction on transformational leadership and will follow this up with a similar overview of adaptive leadership, followed by examinations of charismatic, dynamical, servant, and authentic leadership. This series will include some guest submissions by writers that are intimately familiar with these various leadership theories, models, and approaches.
Introduction to Adaptive Leadership
The ideas and practices surrounding adaptive leadership have been advanced in large part by Ron Heifetz and Marty Linsky in the books “Leadership without Easy Answers” and “Leadership on the Line” and more recently with the help of Alexander Grashow in the book “The Practice of Adaptive Leadership”. This introduction, and the upcoming blog entries, will draw in large part from the work of these three subject matter experts.
What is Adaptive Leadership?
Heifetz et al believe that leadership is, at its essence, about influencing change that builds and enables the capacity of individuals and organizations to thrive. Specifically, that leadership is the practice of mobilizing groups of people to tackle tough challenges and thrive. The bottom line is that leaders need to understand the importance of adaptation and are able to employ the relevant processes and tools to build the adaptive capacity of organizations.
What does it mean to be adaptive?
The word “adaptive” in adaptive leadership is drawn from evolutionary biology and refers to the process that organisms follow if they are going to survive and thrive. The three components of this process (applied to organizations) are to 1) preserve the organizational elements necessary for survival, 2) remove (or modify) the elements that are no longer necessary or useful, and 3) create (aka innovate) new arrangements that enable the organization to thrive.
What does it mean to thrive?
In adaptive leadership, to thrive is to develop new capabilities and strategies to address changes in the environment (e.g. industry) and realize strategic vision and goals. The key for an adaptive leader is to understand what it means for a specific organization to thrive, and then help make that happen. To thrive is to successfully adapt to circumstances, make desired changes, and stay anchored to what is best about the organization in the process. This requires an appreciation for the core values, purposes (whether explicit or implicit), and the history of the organization.
What are Adaptive Leadership competencies?
The adaptive leadership approach views leadership more as a process than a set of competencies. Having said this, the following are some skills, attitudes, and implied qualities that align with adaptive leadership.
- The adaptive leader needs to be able to connect organizational change to the core values, capabilities, and dreams of the relevant stakeholders
- The adaptive leader seeks to foster a culture that collects and honors diversity of opinion and uses this collective knowledge for the good of the organization
- The adaptive leader knows that change and learning can be painful for people, and is able to anticipate and counteract any reluctant behavior related to the pain
- The adaptive leader understands that large scale change is an incremental process and that he/she needs to be persistent and willing to withstand pressure to take shortcuts
What is the theory that informs adaptive leadership?
The theory that informs adaptive leadership appears to be more about the nature of organizations than about the nature of leadership. In the writings of Heifetz et al, the clearest theoretical underpinning is the speculation that organizations adhere to the same processes outlined in evolutionary biology. It is the task of the leader to understand this theoretical framework (metaphor?) and use it to guide and strengthen the organization. If you are familiar with adaptive leadership, let me know if you agree or disagree with this notion that its theoretical focus is on organizations rather than on leadership.
What’s next?
The next few weeks will entail a more detailed examination of the unique elements of adaptive leadership and some of the different adaptive leadership tools and practices.
Dr. Steven Ober is a senior executive coach and consultant. He has worked successfully with executives and managers in high tech, business and industry, health care, government, and education.
Carol Mase, President of Cairn Consultants, is an educator and coach-consultant who has worked worked in global marketing, strategic planning, and large scale organizational change.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by David Kasprzak, FreeMgmtLibrary. FreeMgmtLibrary said: Leadership: Adaptive Leadership http://managementhelp.org/blogs/leadership/2010/07/07/adaptive-leadership/ [...]
I wholeheartedly agree that the theoretical focus of adaptive leadership is on the organization and not on one particular leadership style or approach. I am a senior pastor at a church and for the last three churches in which I have worked, I have taken an adaptive approach. I’m not sure I knew what to call it, but I knew that for these churches to grow, I needed to become whatever kind of leader was necessary for the church to move in the direction that God intended it to go.
Now, how one goes about determining God’s direction for a church is another matter entirely. But I took an adaptive approach basically asking; what is the greatest need? (whether to eliminate unnecessary or undesireable elements whether people in certain positions or entire ministries or to add people, positions or ministries) Then ask, “how can I put myself in a position to best facilitate the direction we are going?” In some cases, I would take charge of a particular ministry for a time, train up a mentor and hand it over. Sometimes, I will delegate a position right off the bat. The point remains – the focus is on the organization, not the leader.
This to me is also descriptive of Jim Collins theory of 5th level leadership – where the organization becomes the focus of the leaders attention instead of the leader being the focus of the organizations attention. Churches that are leader focused will fall apart when the leader leaves! Churches that are purpose driven, whose leaders are focused on the mission will continue to thrive when the leader leaves.
Like the article and agree with it in principle. I epecially like your list of adaptive leader competencies, but I would add one. . . .
(Insert Bullet) The adaptive leader needs to be have an attitude of humility that will enable to him or her to learn and acquire new skills for the sake of the organization.
Just my two cents.