3 responses to “Another Reason Why I Object To Feasibility Studies (Part #1 of 2)”

  1. Wow, that sounds like there’s opportunity for a bit of deception in not releasing the details of the interviews. I wonder how many consultants do that and get away with it? It’s certainly not good for our profession if it is happening.

    Sandy Rees, CFRE

    1. Sandy,

      Deception

      is only one of the terms I use to describe the traditional process. Of course not every person/firm who does a feasibility study and insists on

      confidential interviews

      is doing it to be deceptive. Many do it that way because that’s the way it’s always been done. (Where have I heard that before ??)

    2. Sandy,

      Deception

      is one of the words I use to describe that process; but, not every person/firm that does feasibility studies and insists on

      confidential interviews

      does so to deceive. Many do it that way because

      that’s the way it’s always been done !!

      Either way, The Feasibility Study (as traditionally structured) really is obsolete.